So much that is really important seems really boring.
Much of that boringness is by design.
All of it has a history.
Join me, Dan Bouk, as I work to tell the stories of power, politics, meaning, and identity that hide within and behind bureaucracies, budgets, censuses, and all sorts of public and private numbers.
And now the stories...
What did rationality look like to an enslaved woman?
Our History Lab has been on a hunt for notable people in the 1950 census. In another post, I wrote a bit about the “thrill of the chase.” I asked Ashley Tourtelot, a lab member and Colgate senior, to reflect further on what drives her to go looking for one person, and then another, and then another. She put it this way:
The task begins once you have a name in mind, and from then on, you partake in a mini scavenger hunt. First, you search for the person adding state and county, but you are left with nothing after screening ten, maybe twenty, pages of results. You are forced to narrow your search, do some extra digging, and learn more about the person you knew very little about. Suddenly, finding a person becomes more meaningful because you are not looking for simply a name anymore; you are looking to find a person who is at first lost in the record. Then you finally narrow your search down, to be met with another series of pages to look over. As you go through each page, you feel yourself getting closer and closer to finding that name because you are in the home stretch, and without expecting it, but knowing you have the pieces there, suspense and expectancy shift into rapid reward. It is like putting the last piece of the puzzle in. The immediate satisfaction of recovering that name, knowing that the person is there, makes you want to do more, and so you do.
subscribe via RSS